Steve Bannon | Full Address and Q&A | Oxford Union

Gotta love all the snowflakes asking their NPC questions without really engaging in an actual dialogue or listening. Orange Man Bad Fascists badHey Hey
Ho Ho
Bannon has Got to Go




Nothing worse than an over-privileged, over-educated yet not very bright upper class idiots, virtue signalling their arses off, to justify their elite position, that was given purely by right of birth, not by merit. Steve Bannon is speaking for the 'Working Class' here to a bunch of arrogant upper class twits, this has been painful and embarrassing to witness. God protect us from these fragile fools. These students do not seem worthy of a university with such a reputation.

___

Vad ca mai multi "experti", ce s-au autointitulat "societate civila", trimit scrisori prin care spun ca problema e la popor, pentru ca voteaza. Si ca votul nu ar trebui sa fie lasat pe mana oricui, venind in sprijinul afirmatiei lor cu un citat din Thatcher, la referendumul lor din 1975.

Thatcher cand a spus despre referendum ca e un instrument pentru dictatori sau demagogi s-a referit la altceva, dar nu stiu cati din cei de acolo au avut rabdarea de a vedea motivul. Ea atunci s-a referit la ramanerea in the piata comuna europeana, unde nu se punea problema suveranitatii, nici problema cedarii puterii parlamentare catre un consiliu de unelected bureucrats, ce stabilesc ei impreuna care e binele comun. Thatcher niciodata nu ar fi fost de acord cu cedarea suveranitatii, nici la nivel de individ, nici la nivel statal. Altfel nu mai exista legitimitate pentru nimic.

In 1975 Common Market era ok, insa dupa Maastricht in UE s-a impus o viziune Socialist federalista cu care UK nu a fost niciodata de acord pentru ca in practica devenise o subminare prin reguli care de care mai idioate a Pietei Comune, pentru care britanicii intrasera in UE. Nici o legatura cu Piata Comuna pentru care britanicii intrasera initial. Cautati discursul No, No, No al premierului britanic Margaret Thatcher si va veti convinge. Sunt argumente la orice pas. De altfel exista si scrisori clare in care ea se disociaza clar de aceasta abordare, si nu ar fi fost de acord niciodata cu asa ceva.

Da, un referendum poate fi anticonstitutional. Cand multimea voteaza ca toti copiii trebuie luati de la parinti si dati la casa de copii, sau cand isi da cu parerea in stiinta (global warming) e clar ca trebuie limite constitutionale. Pentru ca de prea multe ori multimea ba chiar si academiile de stiinta (vezi Franta si aparatele mai grele ca aerul) au gresit. Este exact ce incercau sa evite fondatorii US atunci cand spuneau ca:

"Democracy ..wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There is never a democracy that did not commit suicide.” (John Adams),

sau

“Democracy is the most vile form of government... democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention... incompatible with personal security or the rights of property.” (James Madison)

sau

“The majority, oppressing an individual, is guilty of a crime, abuses its strength, and ... breaks up the foundations of society." (Thomas Jefferson)

sau

“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.” - (Benjamin Franklin)

e motivul pentru care H. L. Mencken zicea ca:

[D]emocracy gives [the beatification of mediocrity] a certain appearance of objective and demonstrable truth. The mob man, functioning as citizen, gets a feeling that he is really important to the world—that he is genuinely running things. Out of his maudlin herding after rogues and mountebanks there comes to him a sense of vast and mysterious power—which is what makes archbishops, police sergeants, the grand goblins of the Ku Klux and other such magnificoes happy. And out of it there comes, too, a conviction that he is somehow wise, that his views are taken seriously by his betters — which is what makes United States Senators, fortune tellers and Young Intellectuals happy. Finally, there comes out of it a glowing consciousness of a high duty triumphantly done which is what makes hangmen and husbands happy.

The larger the mob, the harder the test. In small areas, before small electorates, a first-rate man occasionally fights his way through, carrying even the mob with him by force of his personality. But when the field is nationwide, and the fight must be waged chiefly at second and third hand, and the force of personality cannot so readily make itself felt, then all the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre — the man who can most easily adeptly disperse the notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum".

____

Thatcher stia aceste lucruri. Le intelegea perfect. Progresistii nostri insa nu inteleg de ce au vrut fondatorii in US sa evite cu orice pret, de ce nu apare NICAIERI in Constitutia US cuvantul democratie. Nu! Habar nu au, nu vor sa afle. Nu sunt interesati. Ei deja au stabilit.

Au scos un citat dintr-un context (5 June 1975), si il folosesc drept argument. E metoda prin care presa intoxica, si in loc sa caute adevarul, nu face decat sa-l ascunda, sa-l perverteasca, sa-l transforme in unealta politica, sau de santaj. E metoda prin care fariseii din templu impuneau versiunea lor de adevar, ba te mai si judecau pentru asta. De aceea libertatea presei este o chestiune fundamentala insa NU este absoluta, cum gresit au impresia expertii de la SNSPA. Da, poti spune orice tampenie. Insa NU orice este permis. Stiu ca pare un paradox, insa asta e domeniul lor, si ii las pe ei sa descopere de ce.

"It is a melancholy truth, that a suppression of the press could not more compleatly deprive the nation of it's benefits, than is done by it's abandoned prostitution to falsehood. Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day. I really look with commiseration over the great body of my fellow citizens, who, reading newspapers, live & die in the belief, that they have known something of what has been passing in the world in their time; whereas the accounts they have read in newspapers are just as true a history of any other period of the world as of the present, except that the real names of the day are affixed to their fables. General facts may indeed be collected from them, such as that Europe is now at war, that Bonaparte has been a successful warrior, that he has subjected a great portion of Europe to his will, &c., &c.; but no details can be relied on. 

I will add, that the man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them; inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods & errors. He who reads nothing will still learn the great facts, and the details are all false". (Thomas Jefferson to John Norvell, June 11, 1807)

"This blessed country of free inquiry and belief has surrendered its creed and conscience to neither kings nor priests." (Thomas Jefferson to Benjamin Waterhouse, 1822).

"For I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."

____

“And hence when by their foolish thirst for reputation they have created among the masses an appetite for gifts and the habit of receiving them, democracy in its turn is abolished and changes into a rule of force and violence. For the people, having grown accustomed to feed at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others, as soon as they find a leader who is enterprising but is excluded from the houses of office by his penury, institute the rule of violence; and now uniting their forces massacre, banish, and plunder, until they degenerate again into perfect savages and find once more a master and monarch.” - The Histories 6.9.7-9, Polybius (ca. 200–118 BC)

Cam asta e diferenta.

Earth Hour in Coreea de Nord. Every hour:

John Galt - Ep. 4 "The Standard of Morality"

"Nothing but the most exemplary morals can give dignity to a man of small fortune". Adam Smith - Book V, The Wealth of Nations (1776)

Ethical egoism (also called simply egoism) is the normative ethical position that moral agents ought to do what is in their own self-interest. It differs from psychological egoism, which claims that people can only act in their self-interest. Ethical egoism also differs from rational egoism, which holds merely that it is rational to act in one's self-interest. Ethical egoism contrasts with ethical altruism, which holds that moral agents have an obligation to help and serve others (Vezi Drepturi pozitive - Sa ne dea, sa ne faca). 

Max Stirner was the first philosopher to call himself an egoist, it is questionable if he wanted to install a new idea of morality (ethical egoism) or argue against morality (amoralism). Others, such as Thomas Hobbes and David Gauthier, have argued that the conflicts which arise when people each pursue their own ends can be resolved for the best of each individual only if they all voluntarily forgo some of their aims — that is, one's self-interest is often best pursued by allowing others to pursue their self-interest as well so that liberty is equal among individuals. Sacrificing one's short-term self-interest to maximize one's long-term self-interest is one form of "rational self-interest" which is the idea behind most philosophers' advocacy of ethical egoism. Egoists have also argued that one's actual interests are not immediately obvious, and that the pursuit of self-interest involves more than merely the acquisition of some good, but the maximizing of one's chances of survival and/or happiness.

Noted egoist Ayn Rand argued that there is a positive harmony of interests among free, rational humans, such that no moral agent can rationally coerce another person consistently with his own actual, long-term self-interest. Rand argued that other people are an enormous value to an individual's well-being (through education, trade and affection), but also that this value could be fully realized only under conditions of political and economic freedom. According to Rand, voluntary trade alone can assure that human interaction is mutually beneficial (sau cum spunea Adam Smith, "Nobody ever saw a dog make a fair and deliberate exchange of one bone for another with another dog"). Rand's student, Leonard Peikoff has argued that the identification of one's interests itself is impossible absent the use of principles, and that self-interest cannot be consistently pursued absent a consistent adherence to certain ethical principles. Recently, Rand's position has also been defended by such writers as Tara Smith, Tibor Machan, Allan Gotthelf, David Kelley, Douglas Rasmussen, Nathaniel Branden, Harry Binswanger, Andrew Bernstein and Craig Biddle in his 2002 work, Loving Life: The Morality of Self-Interest and the Facts that Support It.

Philosopher David L. Norton identified himself an "ethical individualist," and, like Rand, saw a harmony between an individual's fidelity to his own self-actualization, or "personal destiny," and the achievement of society's well being.^[

German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche suggested that egoistic or "life-affirming" behavior stimulates jealousy or "ressentiment" in others, and that this is the psychological motive for the altruism in Christianity. Sociologist Helmut Schoeck similarly considered envy the motive of collective efforts by society to reduce the disproportionate gains of successful individuals through moral or legal constraints, with altruism being primary among these.

In addition, Nietzsche (in Beyond Good and Evil) and Alasdair MacIntyre (in After Virtue) have pointed out that the ancient Greeks did not associate morality with altruism in the way that post-Christian Western civilization has done. Aristotle's view is that we have duties to ourselves as well as to other people (e.g. friends) and to the polis as a whole. The same is true for Thomas Aquinas, Christian Wolff and Immanuel Kant, who claim that there are duties to ourselves as Aristotle did, although it has been argued that, for Aristotle, the duty to one's self is primary.

The term ethical egoism has been applied retroactively to philosophers such as Bernard de Mandeville and to many other materialists of his generation, although none of them declared themselves to be egoists. Note that materialism does not necessarily imply egoism, as indicated by Karl Marx, and the many other materialists who espoused forms of collectivism.

It has been argued that ethical egoism lends itself to individualist anarchism, as in the work of Murray Rothbard, and is another way of describing the sense that the common good should be enjoyed by all. However, most notable anarchists in history have advocated socialistic altruistic views.

Să ne dea, să ne faca..

Motto: If being a winner in nature’s struggle for survival is selfish, does being extinct make you an altruist? 


Art 36 din Constituţie: (2) "Nu au drept de vot debilii sau alienaţii mintal, puşi sub interdicţie, şi nici persoanele condamnate, prin hotărâre judecătorească definitivă, la pierderea drepturilor electorale. "


Ar trebui sa fie inclusi si asistatii social. Si bugetarii. Ei nu contribuie cu nimic si ar vota pe cei care i-ar tine in perfuzii si in Wonderland mereu. 

Trebuie sa fii complet nebun sa crezi ca ai dreptul sa votezi si sa-ti dai cu parerea cand tu nu contribui cu nimic, ba mai mult, doar primesti. Chestia asta ar duce automat la o inflatie de promisiuni electorale (ce nu vor fi niciodata indeplinite - evident), care mai de care mai absurda si irealizabila, care in final se va intoarce exact impotriva alegatorului de rand. Prin urmare, astfel de idioti (atarnatorii de care vorbeam mai sus) n-ar trebui sa aiba drept de vot nici azi, in conditiile legii de acum. Insa cine sa o aplice. Dar cine sa inteleaga..


Cand primesti un cadou nu ai nici un drept sa pui conditii ci numai sa-l refuzi. "Drepturile pozitive" sunt o poveste pentru adormit copii sau socialisti ce au impresia ca o nevoie poate sta la baza unui drept. Ciudat e cum toti se mira ca aceste "nobile idealuri" se termina de absolut fiecare data, in dezastru..

Normal ar fi ca oricine isi da cu parerea sa o faca pe banii lui. Ca la poker: pui banii pe masa, vorbesti. Nu pui banii, nu risti nimic, atunci asta e. Si la revedere.



Altfel ajugem inevitabil sa facem "Bine cu forta" sau "We must FORCE the people to be FREE!" - Louis Antoine Léon de Saint-Just 1789 France (a murit decapitat 5 ani mai tarziu), care stim prea bine unde a dus..

Update decembrie 2012: daca esti asistat sau condamnat penal nu ar trebui sa nu poti nici candida. În Parlament au fost votati 27 de condamnaţi, arestaţi, incompatibili şi cercetaţi penal.

Marxism Leninismul anilor 2000

Despre sclavia moderna, film ce arata perspectiva marxista asupra lumii.

Incercati sa nu picati in plasa lor, totusi..

:)

A painful lesson in Economics

The welfare state is GONE!

Get used to it!

 

(link softpedia august 2009: RBC theory)

:)

(Video from: inliniedreapta.net)

Remember, remember, the 5'th of November

"Remember, remember, the 5'th of November
The gunpowder treason and plot
I know of no reason
Why the gunpowder treason
Should ever be forgot"

18 Septembrie 2008 - 5 Noiembrie 2010

The military brass received a huge boost from President Medvedev after he hinted in an interview last week that Russia may have to prepare for.another world war.

"..truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror."

12 oct 2010: The North Korean government smuggled six nuclear weapons into Japan to use as blackmail against the Japanese government, according to a senior Japanese public security police source. Five of the bombs have been seized by Japanese authorities but the sixth is located in the basement of the headquarters of the General Association of Korean Residents in Japan (Chosen Soren) and police have been warned it will be set off if they try to seize it. The discovery of the bombs by Japanese authorities confirms the original warning about the North Korean plot to attack with Japan that from a KGB agent who claimed to report directly to Russian Prime Minister Putin. The nuclear blackmail is linked to a failed Federal Reserve Board crime syndicate plot to start World War 3 on the Korean peninsula in a bid to stave off bankruptcy.

The first shots of WW3 have begun, the FED is in a fight for its life. The FED is BK; do not think otherwise, it is going to be extreme going forward from here! The fight has begun and the FED will somehow start a war to eliminate the EU and the IMF...based in where; Europe. The IMF is out to destroy the FED Banks! I will say again; by 2016 most of Europe will be empty...

.. 

V is for Vendetta (video Domino Plot)

Good evening, London. Allow me first to apologize for this interruption. I do, like many of you, appreciate the comforts of the everyday routine, the security of the familiar, the tranquility of repetition. I enjoy them as much as any bloke. But in the spirit of commemoration - whereby those important events of the past, usually associated with someone's death or the end of some awful bloody struggle, are celebrated with a nice holiday - I thought we could mark this November the fifth, a day that is sadly no longer remembered, by taking some time out of our daily lives to sit down and have a little chat.

There are, of course, those who do not want us to speak. I suspect even now orders are being shouted into telephones and men with guns will soon be on their way. Why? Because while the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power. Words offer the means to meaning and for those who will listen, the enunciation of Truth. And the truth is, there is something terribly wrong with this country, isn't there?

Cruelty and injustice...intolerance and oppression. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance, coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission. How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those who are more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable. But again, Truth be told...if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

I know why you did it. I know you were afraid. Who wouldn't be? War. Terror. Disease. There were a myriad of problems which conspired to corrupt your reason and rob you of your common sense. Fear got the best of you and in your panic, you turned to the now High Chancellor Adam Sutler. He promised you order. He promised you peace. And all he demanded in return was your silent, obedient consent.

Last night, I sought to end that silence. Last night, I destroyed the Old Bailey to remind this country of what it has forgotten. More than four hundred years ago, a great citizen wished to embed the fifth of November forever in our memory. His hope was to remind the world that fairness, justice and freedom are more than words - they are perspectives. So if you've seen nothing, if the crimes of this government remain unknown to you, then I would suggest that you allow the fifth of November to pass unmarked. But if you see what I see, if you feel as I feel, and if you would seek as I seek...then I ask you to stand beside me, one year from tonight, outside the gates of Parliament. And together, we shall give them a fifth of November that shall never, ever, be forgot!


Auziti si voi cavaleria?

20 de ani

The Lost Chance of 1989: The Fall Of The Wall




Un film ce nu se adreseaza oricui, ce trebuie digerat cu atentie pentru ca astazi traim in exact acelasi context mondial ca atunci (insa la alta scara, evident). Aceleasi discutii despre socialismul stiintific (mai nou asa zis "liberal") le avem si acum, si se pare ca nu am invatat nimic. Lumea este multipolara insa e impartita tot intre aceleasi doua doctrine - ce dupa parerea unora ar fi "complementare" - , compromisurile sunt la fel de mari.


Au trecut 20 de ani insa niciodata nu e prea tarziu.